It’s for chapters like these that we read books. Let’s break
down what Tolkien is doing.
The chapter begins with momentum from a cliffhanger of a
previous chapter, Balin’s death. Gandalf finds an old book with haunting
fragments, describing Balin’s expedition into the mines. The expedition did not
fare well, and the burnt out words and lack of clarity as to what went wrong
makes the scene more eerie. It's a classic trope, but done really well here. The book foreshadows drums, and ends with the forlorn line, “We cannot get out, we cannot get out.”
Notice the language that Tolkien uses in creating his world:
he references in the book specific halls that give the illusion that there is
more to Moria than just the scenes described thus far. It’s little snippets like
these that allow novels to have depth that go outside what the characters are
actually experiencing, and make a book three dimensional. (Note that while the
LOTR world-building is three-dimensional, the characters in LOTR so far are not
three dimensional. At least not yet. So far we’ve had little thought from any
character, and each of the Company are little more than caricatures. The only
character so far with any semblance of depth is probably Strider, and the character
of Gandalf is well-done, though two-dimensional, in his role as the wise wizard.
Feel free to chime in Jacob and Ben whether you think I’m wrong about this.)
In this chapter, I found myself wanting to read on, even
knowing what happened. Unfortunately I don’t remember what I was thinking or
feeling the first time I read this chapter. My experience this time was one of
awe at how well the chapter was done.
So you’ll never guess what happens next. As foreshadowed in the book Gandalf finds, drums begin to
beat, and Gandalf growls that they shouldn’t have been reading a book. One of the Company members suggests running, but Tolkien rules that possibility out by telling the reader the Company needs to stay and fight in the tomb
(Gandalf notes that it would serve no purpose to flee into the darkness,
although later that’s exactly what they do.)
A battle occurs next, which is very simplistic in its
language. Orc heads are cleaved, arrows whine, and even Sam gets a kill, though
is bleeding from a nasty scrape in the head. There are not blow-by-blow accounts here, and the scene is no less compelling for it. This is also where Bilbo’s gift
comes into play, where an orc chieftain rams his spear into Frodo. Everyone thinks
Frodo is dead. But Frodo declares himself not dead, and Gandalf notes that
there is more to Frodo than meets the eye, like Bilbo. (A very Gandalf line
that references the first book, and is a nice touch of consistent
characterization.) I anxiously then was waiting for Aragon’s movie line, “That
thrust would have skewered a wild boar,” and it did not happen until way after when the
Company leaves Balin’s tomb and goes into the next chapter safely (Lothlorien). When it wasn’t said at first, I was actually
disappointed, because I thought it was a good line. But lo and behold, when the
Company is out of Balin’s tomb, Aragon says it in the Lothlorien chapter, and I
was made whole.
Gandalf’s first confrontation with the Balrog happens
offstage, and Gandalf describes that he was almost “destroyed.” How well done
was that? This is the difference between a professional writer and an amateur,
knowing what scenes to tell and what scenes to put in action, and what sequence
to put them in. An often heard guideline for writers is to “show, don’t tell.”
This is something that high school teachers teach without actually knowing what
it means. In fact, high school teachers, and college professors, often get it
wrong. Telling is actually a critical tool for a writer. There is nothing more
important than the phrase, “Three days passed without event.” Guess why?
Because otherwise scenes drag out without event, and the story becomes dull. One
of the most difficult parts of writing is knowing what to show and what to
tell. Now, maybe Tolkien could have written an okay scene from Gandalf’s
perspective fighting, and then stagger back to the Company, but the scene
becomes much more compelling when told from Company’s perspective: their leader,
beaten and tired, growling that he needs to rest if all the orcs in Middle
Earth were after them. (Gandalf, apparently, as shown by his short temper on
the matter, is not one that is used to defeat.) The Company is left in suspense, as is the
reader. While in the movies there is a
wizard’s duel earlier with Saruman where Gandalf gets a sound licking, in the books Gandalf was
taken by Saruman by trickery than an outright confrontation of power. (By the
way, I digress, but what the heck is up with the names Saruman and Sauron?
Tolkien really dropped the ball there. Soooo confusing to readers. I remember
this confused me the first time I was reading the books, two powerful villains
with such similar names.) So having Gandalf tell the confrontation, rather than
experience it, is a very nice touch. Note that when Gandalf is telling the
story, the scene is showing, so this isn’t necessarily a perfect example of
knowing when to skip fluff with a simple sentence, but you know what I mean. I
guess it’s a better example of sequencing, and how using a quick reverse-chrono
switch you can create an even more compelling scene.
So then the Company runs, and crosses a narrow bridge that
falls to infinity. And of course, it’s the iconic Gandalf confrontation with
the Balrog. I’ve included all of the sentences I could find that describe the
Balrog, which in the text is interspersed, so you can easily reference what
language Tolkien is using to describe the beast. I think it gives a good example on how you want to use language to create imagery and dramatic suspense. It's clear that Tolkien uses a more classic (i.e. not modern) form of style to convey imagery, but it still works.
But it was not the trolls that had filled the Elf with terror. The ranks of the orcs had opened, and they crowded away, as if they themselves were afraid. Something was coming up behind them. What it was could not be seen: it was like a great shadow, in the middle of which was a dark form, of man-shape maybe, yet greater; and a power and terror seemed to be in it and to go before it. It came to the edge of the fire and the light faded as if a cloud had bent over it. Then with a rush it leaped across the fissure. The flames roared up to greet it, and wreathed about it; and a black smoke swirled in the air. Its streaming mane kindled, and blazed behind it. In its right hand was a blade like a stabbing tongue of fire; in its left it held a whip of many thongs.[. . .] The dark figure streaming with fire raced towards them. [. . .] His enemy halted again, facing him, and the shadow about it reached out like two vast wings. It raised the whip, and the thongs whined and cracked. Fire came from its nostrils. [. . .] The Balrog made no answer. The fire in it seemed to die, but the darkness grew. It stepped forward slowly on to the bridge, and suddenly it drew itself up to a great height , and its wings were spread from wall to wall; but still Gandalf could be seen, glimmering in the gloom; he seemed small, and altogether alone : grey and bent, like a wizened tree before the onset of a storm.
[. . .]
With a terrible cry the Balrog fell forward, and its shadow plunged down and vanished. But even as it fell it swung its whip, and the thongs lashed and curled about the wizard’s knees, dragging him to the brink. He staggered and fell, grasped vainly at the stone, and slid into the abyss . ‘Fly, you fools!’ he cried , and was gone.
It’s here that we leave the fairy-tale land of the Hobbit
behind, and realize that there may not be a happy ending to this tale.
Good observation on how right now Tolkien's world feels more fleshed out than the characters themselves (though I also feel like that is par for the course for most fantasy novels). Strider I agree is the most developed character at the moment, but maybe the others become more like real people as the series progresses? Maybe their afflictions will finally reveal them to us? (Shoot, maybe our trials are what reveal us to ourselves).
ReplyDeleteLikewise I agree that the other characters are one-dimensional. What are their desires? Their fears? Their hopes? Beyond just "completing the quest." I think they will get more fleshed-out as the story progresses (Gimli becomes an admirer of beauty, and Legolas gets snared by the lure of the Sea). But at this point, only Aragorn, Frodo, and Sam have much in the way of character development. I think that Tolkien manages to show Gandalf's hopes and fears, even though he doesn't describe them, but since Gandalf is more of an angelic figure, it's hard to relate to him. Tolkien holds him at a distance throughout the entire series.
ReplyDelete